So, since it’s now April (and I recently finished the book and have it on the brain), I will try and kick off a little discussion on the original vampire novel. (I guess we don’t have a category for it yet? [LEN 10/14/08: I just added it and changed the category for this post...]) If you aren’t ready to start yet, consider it an April Fool’s joke, comment accordingly, and don’t read the rest of this post. Here it goes:
The back cover of my copy of Dracula characterizes it as a novel of “sin and redemption,” among other things. I took this to be one of the Christian themes that Pamela (according to Tato) and Bonnie Kate described, so I went searching for it. Of the numerous snippets of the story and dialogue which relate to redemption, two stand out: Mina’s redemption (or purification) and Dracula’s. My question is: Do either of these correspond to the Christian idea of the redemption of sinners?
Stoker seems to be setting up Mina as this example of redemption, with all her talk of eternal separation from God. But, speaking as a sinner myself, Mina is just too darn good! Maybe it’s just the voices of the men who respect her speaking in their journals, but she is put on a pedestal as a very good woman who does not deserve the eternal damnation Dracula is trying to force upon her. That doesn’t match the Biblical description of the state of humankind as sheep gone astray.
Dracula, on the other hand, more than embodies the Calvinistic “Total Depravity.” And, he is a recipient of unmerited grace when his undead existence is ended. But, he had so little participation in that final redemption that it hardly seems analogous to the Christian salvific faith. (Unless perhaps you are what my husband would label an extreme monergist—roughly, one who believes that God does absolutely everything in saving us and we do absolutely nothing.)
April 2, 2008 at 8:37 am
Monergists are vampires? Excellent, excellent.
April 2, 2008 at 9:48 pm
I’ve been out of town for the last week (and the country, for a portion of that time), so I can’t contribute much more than a hearty thanks, Bonnie, for getting things going here!
But it does seem like Stoker is describes a sense of religion, but not the Biblical descriptions of redemption or relationship, etc…
More later.
August 6, 2008 at 9:24 am
ok I know its too late to really hash it out now, but regarding your comment about Mina being too good – I say that this is maybe a good illustration about how all are poisoned by sin no matter how good we seem.
Salvation is not a matter of being good or bad, its a matter of external redemption, Holiness, and Sanctification. I know plenty of good people who aren’t believers, and I think our ideas of what is good just confuse the situation of salvation by giving “good” people an excuse to not need God or for some to judge others who seem to “really need the Lord”.
August 6, 2008 at 1:32 pm
I’m actually still reading the book! Sloooowwwwly… another few weeks, and I’ll be ready to comment
And great comment, Bonnie!
October 14, 2008 at 1:57 pm
I finally finished reading the book today over lunch… I think if Stoker hadn’t written Van Helsing the way he did (with such horrid grammar), I would have finished it months ago. That and the “journal entry” format were extremely off-putting – though did I eventually make peace with the journal entry format.
While there is something of a Catholic tinge to the redemption (and related topics) in Dracula, I agree that there’s not much that is Biblical in the book.
At some point I’ll post some comments for the record – and perhaps this blog will be more vif, as the professor would say!